Prevention of Radicalism at Islamic Boarding College
Article Main Content
This research aims to identify the background of radical thinking and behaviour among students at an Islamic Boarding College. We analysed through a qualitative descriptive approach by interviewing several key persons from the campus management, and some students indicated to be exposed to radicalism and radical behaviour. The Islamic struggle movement is synonymous with intellectual movement. Thus, radical movements and behaviour must be prevented as early as possible. The actors are the implementers at universities, starting from the study programs, departments, faculties, and university-wide levels. Several recommendations and suggestions were produced through this research to reduce radical understanding in the university environment with several humanist and psychological approaches. One of them is by deepening the Religion and Islamic compulsory courses such as Ahlussunnah wal Jama'ah courses, regular recitations at the faculty and university level to deepen understanding of Islam, as well as educational materials for defending the country and love for the homeland, as well as citizenship materials and others relevant to the mindset of today's students.
References
-
George Ritzer, Douglas J. Goodman, (2011). Modern Sociological Theory., McGraw-Hill Humanities.
Google Scholar
1
-
M. Koukounaras-Liagkis, “The Religious Lesson today and tomorrow. A point of view based on the pedagogical and didactic of the course,” New Education, 146, 123-135, 2013.
Google Scholar
2
-
A. Stogiannidis, “The Course of Religious in Public Education: a Course of Positions, Meditation and Interpretation,” Synthesis, 5 (1), 41-67, 2016.
Google Scholar
3
-
H.Bergson, John Mullarkey, An Introduction to Metaphysics, Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
Google Scholar
4
-
Peter L. Berger, Thomas Luckmann, The Social Construction of Reality, Unites States: Anchor Book, 1966.
Google Scholar
5
-
Jacques Derrida, Acts of Religion. Ed. Gil Anidjar. New York: Routledge Press, 2002.
Google Scholar
6
-
Fritz Heider, The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations, Publons: Psychology Press, 1983.
Google Scholar
7
-
Boaz Ganor, “Defining Terrorism: Is One Man's Terrorist Another Man's Freedom Fighter?” Media Asia Communication Quarterly, Volume 20, Nomor 3, pp. 128-129, 2002.
Google Scholar
8
-
J. S Furnivall, Colonial policy and practice: a comparative study of Burma and Netherlands India, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Google Scholar
9
-
Mauhibur Rokhman, Asep Saefuddin Chalim, Agus Sholahuddin, Dwi Suharnoko, Fadly Usman, Geo-spatial of Terrorism and Radicalism in Indonesia - A Preventive Efforts, IOSR Journal of Humanities And Social Science, Volume 25, Nomor 7, pp. 01-09, 2020.
Google Scholar
10
-
James M. Henslin, Social Problems, Prentice Hall, Second Edition. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs, 1990.
Google Scholar
11
-
John Loftland, Handbook of Ethnography. eds P Atkinson, A Coffey, S Delamont, L Loftland. London: Sage Publications, 2007.
Google Scholar
12
-
Kirsten E. Schulze dan Joseph Chinyong Liow, Making Jihadis, Waging Jihad, “Transnational and local dimensions of the ISIS phenomenon in Indonesia and Malaysia,” Asian Security, pp. 122-139, 2018.
Google Scholar
13
-
William J. Goode dan Paul K. Hatt, Methods in Social Research, Kogakusa: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1981.
Google Scholar
14
-
J. W. Creswell, Research Designs: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Research, USA: Texas Publications, 2011.
Google Scholar
15
-
Zimmerman dan Schank, Educational Psychology, Prentice Hall, New York, Second Edition, 2013.
Google Scholar
16
-
http://dreamsnmotion.com/word-of-the-day/2015/12/19/radicalize.
Google Scholar
17