##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

This study aims to examine the influence of the presence of women on the board such as chief executive officer, chief financial officer and chief audit committee on the earning management (EM) practices and also to examine whether the educational backgrounds of women executive officials have a moderating effect on the earning management practice. The data used is secondary data from Indonesian listed manufacturing companies, hypothesis testing using regression model with partial least square test. Sampling was carried out using a purposive sampling method. The results showed that female chief executive officer and female chief financial officer did not affect earning management practice, but woman as chief audit committee affect the company's earnings management practices. Education background capable as moderating variable to strengthen the influence women as chief executive officer, chief financial officer and women as chief audit committee to earnings management practices. This research can provide contribution for users of financial statements about the possibility of differences in earnings management practices due to the presence of women in top management positions.

References

  1. Abdelghany, K. E. M. (2005). Measuring the quality of earnings. Managerial Auditing Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900510625334
     Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed, M. I., & Che-Ahmad, A. (2016). Effects of corporate governance characteristics on audit report lags. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues.
     Google Scholar
  3. Asian Development Bank. (2016). Analysis of Trends and Challenges in the Indonesian Labor Market. Asian Development Bank (ADB) Paper on Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RCP.2015.08.004
     Google Scholar
  4. Chen, E., & Gavious, I. (2016). Complementary relationship between female directors and financial literacy in deterring earnings management: The case of high-technology firms. Advances in Accounting. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2016.06.001
     Google Scholar
  5. Clout, V. J., & Willett, R. J. (2016). Earnings in firm valuation and their value relevance. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2016.09.005
     Google Scholar
  6. Cumming, D., Leung, T. Y., & Rui, O. (2015). Gender diversity and securities fraud. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0750
     Google Scholar
  7. DeFond, M. L. (2010). Earnings quality research: Advances, challenges and future research. Journal of Accounting and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.10.004
     Google Scholar
  8. Donaldson, & Davis. (1991). Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: Australian Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/031289629101600103
     Google Scholar
  9. Duru, K and Alexandros, T. (2013). Managerial Incentives and Earnings Management: An Empirical Examination of the Income Smoothing in the Nordic Banking Industry Kenneth Duru and Alexandros Tsitinidis ∗. Working Paper, UPPSALA Universitet, May.
     Google Scholar
  10. Eddleston, K. A., & Powell, G. N. (2012). Nurturing Entrepreneurs’ Work-Family Balance: A Gendered Perspective. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00506.x
     Google Scholar
  11. Garba, T., & Abubakar, B. A. (2014). CORPORATE BOARD DIVERSITY AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF INSURANCE COMPANIES IN NIGERIA: AN APPLICATION OF PANEL DATA APPROACH. Asian Economic and Financial Review.
     Google Scholar
  12. García-Sánchez, I. M., Martínez-Ferrero, J., & García-Meca, E. (2017). Gender diversity, financial expertise and its effects on accounting quality. Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2016-0090
     Google Scholar
  13. Ginesti, G., Drago, C., Macchioni, R., & Sannino, G. (2018). Female board participation and annual report readability in firms with boardroom connections. Gender in Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-07-2017-0079
     Google Scholar
  14. Handajani, L., Subroto, B., & Saraswati, E. (2014). Does board diversity matter on corporate social disclosure? An Indonesian evidence. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development.
     Google Scholar
  15. Hasnawati, Murwaningsari, E., Yanti, H. B., & Suhendar. (2019). Do women on board, risk management, investment in non-core business and strategic choices affect earning persistence?-case in Indonesia. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7483
     Google Scholar
  16. Hejazi, R., Ansari, Z., Sarikhani, M., & Ebrahimi, F. (2011). The Impact Of Earnings Quality And Income Smoothing On The Performance Of Companies Listed In Tehran Stock Exchange. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(17), 193–197. http://search.proquest.com/docview/904522920?accountid=12528%5Cnhttp://monash-dc05.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/openurl/MUA/MUL_SERVICES_PAGE?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&genre=article&sid=ProQ:ProQ:abiglobal&atitle=The+Impact+
     Google Scholar
  17. Jaskiewicz, P., Combs, J. G., & Rau, S. B. (2015). Entrepreneurial legacy: Toward a theory of how some family firms nurture transgenerational entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.07.001
     Google Scholar
  18. Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (2012). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. In The Economic Nature of the Firm: A Reader, Third Edition. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817410.023
     Google Scholar
  19. Kerwin, R. J. (1995). Financial statement fraud. In The Secured Lender (Vol. 51, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118527436
     Google Scholar
  20. Khan, A. W., & Abdul Subhan, Q. (2019). Impact of board diversity and audit on firm performance. Cogent Business and Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1611719
     Google Scholar
  21. Lan, L. L., & Heracleous, L. (2010). Rethinking agency theory: The view from law. Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2010.48463335
     Google Scholar
  22. Mauro, P. (1998). Corruption and the composition of government expenditure. Journal of Public Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00025-5
     Google Scholar
  23. Ming, C., & Earn, L. H. (2016). Estimating the nonlinear effects of female directors on financial performance: The case of Malaysian initial public offering companies. Gender in Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-03-2014-0026
     Google Scholar
  24. Mitra, A. (2003). Breaking the glass ceiling: African‐American women in management positions. Equal Opportunities International. https://doi.org/10.1108/02610150310787379
     Google Scholar
  25. Namazi, M., & Khansalar, E. (2011). An Investigation of The Income Smoothing Behavior of Growth and Value Firms (Case Study: Tehran Stock Exchange Market). International Business Research, 4(4), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v4n4p84
     Google Scholar
  26. Saitri, putu meidayanthi darabali : putu wenny. (2016). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kualitas Laba Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi.
     Google Scholar
  27. Seetharaman, A., Senthilvelmurugan, M., & Periyanayagam, R. (2004). Anatomy of computer accounting frauds. Managerial Auditing Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900410557953
     Google Scholar
  28. Sun, L., & Rath, S. (2009). An Empirical Analysis of Earnings Management in Australia. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 7(6), 1069–1085.
     Google Scholar
  29. White, G. E. (1970). Discretionary Accounting Decisions and Income Normalization. Journal of Accounting Research, 8(2), 260–273. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490111
     Google Scholar
  30. Zango, A. G., Kamardin, H., & Ishak, R. (2016). Audit quality, board gender and financial risk disclosure. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues.
     Google Scholar