Knowledge and Practice of Assessment: Empirical Evidence from Early Childhood Teachers in the Kumasi Metropolis, Ghana
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Sound assessment fosters learning, improves teaching, and provides information about what has been done or achieved by learners. Children cannot develop without them being assessed. However, information available to the researchers suggests that researches is done or are not done specifically at the early childhood level. This sequential explanatory mixed method was used to examine knowledge and assessment practices in some selected ECE centres in the Kumasi Metropolis. Two hundred and forty-two trained early childhood teachers were selected using table of random numbers and purposive sampling procedures. Self-developed questionnaire and a structured interview were used for data collection. The findings show that most of the participants had some level of understanding on assessment practices. It was found that, the majority of the teachers used assessment tools such as class exercise, portfolio building, in assessing their children. It was further found that most of the teachers had some level of experiences as they use the assessment tools, although they couldn’t use multiple tools in their assessment. To maintain and improve the teachers’ level of understanding on assessment practice, it is recommended that refresher courses on modern trends of assessment should be frequently organised to keep and maintain the knowledge base and skills of the teachers in assessment practices. It is also recommended that teachers should be sensitized on regular basis on the importance of their assessment practices to effectively practicalize the assessment done on pupils.
References
-
D. D. Dixson & F. C. Worrell. “Formative and summative assessment in the classroom”, Theory into practice, 2016, 55(2), pp. 153-159.
Google Scholar
1
-
P. W. Airasian. Classroom assessment: Concepts and applications. New York: McGraw-Hill. 2011
Google Scholar
2
-
C. DeLuca, A. Coombs & D. LaPointe-McEwan. “Assessment mindset: Exploring the relationship between teacher mindset and approaches to classroom assessment”, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2019, 61, pp. 159-169.
Google Scholar
3
-
J. H. McMillan. “Section discussion: Student perceptions of assessment”, Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment, 2016, pp. 221-243.
Google Scholar
4
-
C. McLachlan, M. Fleer & S. Edwards. Early childhood curriculum: Planning, assessment and implementation. Cambridge University Press. 2018
Google Scholar
5
-
M. Heritage. Formative Assessment: Making it happen in the classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press 2019
Google Scholar
6
-
K. Asare. “Exploring the kindergarten teachers’ assessment practices in Ghana”, Assessment, 2015. 5(8).
Google Scholar
7
-
Anane & Y. M. Anhwere. “Assessment in preschools in Ghana: Issues and challenges”, Journal of Education Development and Practice, 2013, 4(22), pp. 24-29.
Google Scholar
8
-
C. Chester & S. M. Quilter. “Inservice teachers’ perceptions of education assessment”, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 1998, 33(2), pp. 210-236.
Google Scholar
9
-
M. Rahman. “Exploring science teachers' perception of classroom assessment in secondary schools of Bangladesh”, European Journal of Education Studies, 2018, 4(9), pp. 139-160.
Google Scholar
10
-
C. M. Müller, V. Hofmann, T. Begert & A. H. Cillessen. “Peer influence on disruptive classroom behavior depends on teachers' instructional practice”, Journal of applied developmental psychology, 2018, 56, pp. 99-108.
Google Scholar
11
-
B. B. Levin. “The development of teachers’ beliefs”, International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs, 2015, 1, pp. 48-65.
Google Scholar
12
-
A. Yates. Economics and accounting teachers’ beliefs about school-based assessment, the summative and formative tension: A mixed method study. 2018.
Google Scholar
13
-
A. Azis. “Conception and practices of assessment: A case of teachers representing improvement conception”, TEFLIN Journal, 2015, 26(2), pp. 129-154.
Google Scholar
14
-
N. Barnes, H. Fives & C. M. Dacey. “Teachers’ beliefs about assessment”. In H. Fives & M. Gill (eds.), International handbook of research on teachers' beliefs. NY: Routledge. 2015, pp. 284-300.
Google Scholar
15
-
A. Ghaicha. “Theoretical Framework for Educational Assessment: A Synoptic Review”, Journal of Education and Practice, 2016, 7(24), pp. 212-231.
Google Scholar
16
-
M. Tobajas, C. B. Molina, A. Quintanilla N. Alonso-Morales & J. A. Casas. “Development and application of scoring rubrics for evaluating students’ competencies and learning outcomes in Chemical Engineering experimental courses. Education for Chemical” Engineers 2019, 26, pp. 80-88.
Google Scholar
17
-
N. Hempeck. Methods for documenting student progress: Strategies for Assessing and Keeping Records in the Classroom: 2009. Retrieved from http://www.Suite101.Com/profile.cfm
Google Scholar
18
-
A. J. Nitko & S. M. Brookhart. Educational assessment of student. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall. 2007.
Google Scholar
19
-
F. K. Amedahe. Continuous assessment. Unpublished paper, University of Cape Coast, Ghana. 2000
Google Scholar
20
-
C. Cobbold & P. Boateng. “Exploring the instructional practices efficacy beliefs of Kindergarten teachers in the Kumasi Metropolis of Ghana”, Journal of Education Development and Practice, 2015, 5(6), pp. 173-187.
Google Scholar
21
-
E. Sasu. Testing practices of secondary schools in the Central Region of Ghana. Unpublished Master‘s thesis, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana. 2017.
Google Scholar
22
-
Y. Xu & G. T. Brown. “Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization”, Teaching and Teacher Education, 2016 58, pp. 149-162.
Google Scholar
23
-
C. Deluca, D. Lapointe-Mcewan, & U. Luhanga. “Teacher assessment literacy: A review of international standards and measures”, Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 2016 28(3), pp. 251-272.
Google Scholar
24
-
R. J. Stiggins. Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappa. (2005)8 (10), 758-765.
Google Scholar
25
-
M. Murukutla. “The Effects of Background, Classroom Assessment Competence, Self-efficacy, and Self-perceived Assessment Skills on Classroom Assessment Practices of Teachers in India”. Doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada, Las Vegas 2019
Google Scholar
26
-
J. W. Creswell & J. D. Creswell. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications, 2017.
Google Scholar
27
-
M. L. Patten & M. Newhart. Understanding research methods: An overview of the essentials. Taylor & Francis. 2017
Google Scholar
28
-
R. V. Krejcie & D. W. Morgan. “Determining sample size for research activities” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1970, 30 (3), pp. 607-610
Google Scholar
29
-
H. Ahmad & H. Halim. “Determining Sample Size for Research Activities”, Selangor Business Review, 2017, 2(1), pp. 20-34.
Google Scholar
30
-
J. W. Creswell & Clark, V. L. P. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications. 2017
Google Scholar
31
-
S. A. McLeod. Questionnaire: definition, examples, design and types. Simply Psychology. 2018, https://www.simplypsychology.org/questionnaires.html.
Google Scholar
32
-
R. Kumar. Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners. Sage. 2018
Google Scholar
33
-
J. Harding. Qualitative data analysis: From start to finish. SAGE Publications 2018
Google Scholar
34
-
D. George &, M. Mallery. SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update (11th ed.). 2011, Boston-Pearson.
Google Scholar
35
-
M. A. Pett. Nonparametric statistics for health care research: Statistics for small samples and unusual distributions. Sage Publications, 2015.
Google Scholar
36
-
K. Burke. Balanced assessment: From formative to summative. Solution Tree Press 2010
Google Scholar
37
-
G. S. Hanna & P. A. Dettmer. Assessment for effective teaching: Using context-adaptive planning. Boston, MA: Pearson A & B. 2004
Google Scholar
38
-
J. Hattie & E. M. Anderman. Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement: Schools Edition. New York: Routledge. 2019
Google Scholar
39