PU School of Science and Technology, Nepal
* Corresponding author

Article Main Content

The paper aims to explore the direct or indirect link between the patriarchal Nepalese society and the degradation of Nepal’s forestry and environment. The males of Nepal have been dominating and disrespecting women as the inferior sex for centuries, and thereby treating natural resourses as feminine, weak to be manipulated and consumed objectively for their benefits. The research tool taken to carry out the research is eco-feminism. To notice the relationship between gender and natural resources of Nepal, the theoretical concerns of such eco-feminist critics as Greta Gaard and Vandana Shiva are chiefly focused on. The Nepalese society, like most of the South-Asian societies, is a male-dominated society. It exploits both women and nature regarding them to be inferior. The chief finding is that the natural resources of Nepal such as air, water, green fields, climate, land, forestry, minerals, environment, and the species of Nepal have been getting threatened because of the Nepalese patriarchal society. The Nepali people exploit nature as carelessly as they have been exploiting women. It is assumed that the research scholars interested in exploring Nepalese society from the perspective of eco-feminism can take the article as a reference.

References

  1. Acharya, M. & Ghimire, P. (2005). Gender indicators of equality, inclusion, and poverty reduction: Meaning program/project effectiveness. Economic and Political Weekly, 40, 44-45, 4719-4728. https://www. jstor.com/stable/4417358.
     Google Scholar
  2. Adhikary, J.(2016). Barriers to carrier progressive: A study of the perceptions of Nepali women employees. Journal of Business and Management Research, 1(2), 17-32. https://doi.org/10,3128/jbmr.v/i2.15657.
     Google Scholar
  3. Agarwal, B.(2001). A challenge for eco-feminism: Gender, greening and community forestry in India. Women & Environments International, 52/53, 12-15.
     Google Scholar
  4. Clorfene-Casten, L. (1996). Breast cancer: Poisons, profits, and prevention. Common Courage Press.
     Google Scholar
  5. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA Sage.
     Google Scholar
  6. Gaard, G. (2011). Ecofeminism revisited: Rejecting essentialism and re-placing species in a material feminist environmentalism. Feminist Formations, 23(2), 26-53. DOI:10.1353/ff.2011.0017
     Google Scholar
  7. Heller, C. (1999). Ecology of everyday life: Rethinking the desire for nature. Black Rose Books.
     Google Scholar
  8. Kathmandu air pollution hits record high (2021, January 5). Nepali Times. nepalitimes.com/latest/Kathmandu-air-pollution-hits-record-high/
     Google Scholar
  9. Merchant, C. (1995). Earth care: Women and the environment. Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  10. Milstein, T. & Castro-Sotomayor, J. (2020). Routledge handbook of eco-cultural identity. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351068840.
     Google Scholar
  11. Ministry of forests and soil conservation (2000). The Government of Nepal.
     Google Scholar
  12. Nepal general health risks: Air pollution (2020, April 16). World Health Organization. Retrieved from: https://imt.org/country/Nepal/risk/air-pollution.
     Google Scholar
  13. Population total-Nepal. (n. d). The World Bank Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?locations=NP
     Google Scholar
  14. Shiva, V. (1990). Development as a new project of Western patriarchy. In I. Diamond & G. F. Orenstein (Eds.), Reweaving the world: The emergence of eco-feminism, 189-200. Sierra Club Books.
     Google Scholar
  15. Suwal, S. (n.d.). Water in crisis-Nepal. The Water Project. https://the water project.Org/water crisis/ water-in-crisis-Nepal#
     Google Scholar
  16. Warren, K. J.(2000). Ecofeminist philosophy: A Western perspective on what it is and why it matters. Rowman & Littlefield.
     Google Scholar