Research Article

Medical Disputes on the Concept of Inspanningsverbintenis vs Resultaatsverbintenis: A Critical Review

Sulistini Sulistini
UIN Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung, Indonesia
Iffatin Nur
UIN Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung, Indonesia
* Corresponding author
Akhyak Akhyak
UIN Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung, Indonesia
DOI icon 10.24018/ejsocial.2023.3.2.435

Read Counter
414

Downloads
511

Citations

Share

Article Sidebar

Submitted 2023-03-17
Published 2023-04-11

Read counter = 414 times

Table of Contents

Article Main Content

The relationship between patients and doctors in health services is a therapeutic contract-based relationship. The therapeutic contract begins with an (unwritten) agreement where both parties are assumed to be accommodated when the agreement is reached. Agreement that can be reached include agreeing to medical action or rejecting a medical action plan. Doctors as health workers who work in the health care sector are involved in a working relationship with the hospital as a place to carry out their profession. A doctor working in a hospital also has an administrative relationship that affects rights and obligations between the two parties and responsibilities to third parties. In the relationship between patients and the hospital, patients are the recipient of health services and the hospital is the provider of such services. Hospitals are obliged to provide health services in accordance with health care standards. Doctors, patients and hospitals are in a relationship based on trust, under an assumption that doctors can cure patients' illnesses and will do the best for patients. However, this mindset has changed along with the times, science, and technology that affect the human mind. Their social-moral-oriented relationship has turned into a material-oriented one because doctors face various demands to improve their professionalism. The change in orientation above is one of the causes of medical conflicts and disputes. Conflicts arise between doctors as health service provider and patients as health service receivers. Conflicts can turn into disputes if the party who feels aggrieved has expressed dissatisfaction with the party considered to be the cause. Medical disputes have risen sharply along with the disruption of services amid the turbulence of the COVID-19 pandemic throughout 2020 and 2021. The high rate of disputes also begs question of quality control of health services. This qualitative research-based article attempted to describe and analyze the phenomenon of medical disputes at the Dr. Iskak General Hospital of Tulungagung using the conception of inspanningsverbintenis vs resultaatsverbintenis. The findings show that, in the provision of health services, there may arise four violation categories, namely: ethical violations, disciplinary violations, administrative violations, and legal (both civil and criminal) violations.
Keywords: Health Services Inspanningsverbintenis Medical Disputes Quality Control Resultaatsverbintenis Trust-Based Relationship

References

  1. Agustin, E.N., Maghfiroh, S.A., Annisa, S.R., Khoirunnis, A., & Istanti, N.D. (2023). Analisis Kebijakan Perlindungan Hukum Korban Malpraktek Profesi Medis: A Literature Review. Jurnal Ilmiah Kedokteran Dan Kesehatan, 2(1), 53-64. Indonesian. https://doi.org/10.55606/klinik.v2i1.778.
     Google Scholar
  2. Alawiya, N, Yuliantiningsih, A., & Sari, D. P. Y. P. (2016). Hospital Supervisory Board Role in Medical Dispute Settlement in Hospital (Analysis toward Mechanism and Normative Obstacles). Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 15(3), 266-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2015.15.3.395.
     Google Scholar
  3. Ananda, S. M. F. (2021). Peran BPJS sebagai Perwujudan Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Pelayanan Kesehatan. osfpreprints. Indonesian. https://osf.io/ys5hv.
     Google Scholar
  4. Ardinata, M. (2020). Tanggung Jawab Negara Terhadap Jaminan Kesehatan Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. Jurnal HAM, 11(2), 319-332. Indonesian. http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/ham.2020.11.319-332.
     Google Scholar
  5. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. (3rd ed.). London: SAGE Publication, Inc.
     Google Scholar
  6. Government of Indonesia (GoI). (2004, Oct 6). Undang-undang (UU) tentang Praktik Kedokteran [Indonesian Act No. 29 of 2004 on Medical Practices]. Indonesian. Retrieved from: https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/40752/uu-no-29-tahun-2004.
     Google Scholar
  7. GoI - Regent of Tulungagung. (2005). Keputusan Bupati Tulungagung No : 395 Tahun 2005 tentang Penetapan Kelas Rumah Sakit Umum Dr. Iskak dari Kelas C Menjadi Kelas B Rumah Sakit Non Pendidikan [Decree of the Regent of Tulungagung No: 395 of 2005 on Class Assignment of the Dr. Iskak General Hospital from Class C to Class B Non-educational Hospital]. Indonesian.
     Google Scholar
  8. GoI - Ministry of Health. (2005, April 13). Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 522/Menkes/SK/IV/2005 tentang Peningkatan Kelas Rumah Sakit Umum Dr. Iskak Milik Pemerintah Kabupaten Tulungagung Provinsi Jawa Timur [Decree of the Minister of Health No. 522/Menkes/SK/IV/2005 on the Class Upgrading of the Dr. Iskak General Hospital Owned by the Government of Tulungagung Regency in the East Java Province]. Indonesian.
     Google Scholar
  9. GoI - Regent of Tulungagung. (2008). Keputusan Bupati Tulungagung Nomor : 188.45/554/031/2008 tentang Penetapan Rumah Sakit Umum Dr. Iskak Sebagai Model Pengelolaan Keuangan Badan Layanan Umum Daerah Berstatus Penuh [Decree of the Regent of Tulungagung Number: 188.45/554/031/2008 on the Designation of Dr. Iskak General Hospital as the Model Financial Management of the Regional Public Service Agency with Full Status]. Indonesian.
     Google Scholar
  10. GoI. (2009a, Oct 13). Undang-undang (UU) tentang Kesehatan [Indonesian Act No. 36 of 2009 on Health]. Indonesian. Retrieved from: https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/38778/uu-no-36-tahun-2009.
     Google Scholar
  11. GoI. (2009b, Oct 28). Undang-undang (UU) tentang Rumah Sakit [Indonesian Act No. 44 of 2009 on Hospitals]. Indonesian. Retrieved from: https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/38789/uu-no-44-tahun-2009.
     Google Scholar
  12. GoI. (2014, Oct 17). Undang-undang (UU) tentang Tenaga Kesehatan [Indonesian Act No. 36 of 2014 on Health Workers]. Indonesian.
     Google Scholar
  13. GoI - Governor of East Java. (2015, May 18). Keputusan Gubernur Jawa Timur No. 188/359/KPTS/013/2015 tentang Penetapan RSUP Dr. Iskak sebagai RS Rujukan Daerah yang Menangani Rujukan dari Kabupaten Trenggalek, Kota Blitar, Kabupaten Blitar dan Kabupaten Pacitan [Decree of the Governor of East Java No. 188/359/KPTS/013/2015 on the Designation of Dr. Iskak General Hospital as a Regional Reference Hospital in charge of referrals from Trenggalek Regency, Blitar City, Blitar Regency and Pacitan Regencies]. Indonesian.
     Google Scholar
  14. GoI - Ministry of Health. (2016, May 25). Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor HK.02.03/I/1147/2016 tentang Penetapan Rumah Sakit Umum Dr. Iskak Tulungagung Sebagai Rumah Sakit Pendidikan [Decree of the Minister of Health No. HK.02.03/I/1147/2016 on the Designation of the Dr. Iskak Tulungagung General Hospital as a Teaching Hospital]. Indonesian.
     Google Scholar
  15. GoI - Ministry of Health. (2020a, March 10). Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan No. HK.01.07/MENKES/169/2020 tentang Penetapan Rumah Sakit Rujukan Penanggulangan Penyakit Emerging Tertentu [Decree of the Minister of Health No. HK.01.07/MENKES/169/2020 on Appointment of Referral Hospitals for Certain Emerging Diseases]. Indonesian.
     Google Scholar
  16. GoI - Ministry of Health. (2020b, Nov 24). Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor HK.01.07/MENKES/7182/2020 tentang Rumah Sakit Jejaring Rujukan Kardiovaskuler [Decree of the Minister of Health No. HK.01.07/MENKES/7182/2020 on Cardiovascular Referral Network Hospital]. Indonesian.
     Google Scholar
  17. Jailobaeva, K., Falconer, J., Loffreda, G., Arakelyan, S., Witter, S., & Ager, A. (2021). An analysis of policy and funding priorities of global actors regarding noncommunicable disease in low-and middle-income countries. Globalization and health, 17(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-021-00713-4.
     Google Scholar
  18. Jamaluddin, J., & Karmila, R. (2022). Malpraktik Kedokteran Ditinjau dari Aspek Hukum Pidana, Administrasi dan Etika Profesi. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, 3(04), 538-550. Indonesian. https://doi.org/10.36418/jist.v3i4.419.
     Google Scholar
  19. Junita, N. M. M., & Sugama, I. D. G. D. (2020). Upaya Mediasi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Malpraktik Medis. Journal Ilmu Hukum. 8(11), 1-16. Indonesian. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthawicara/article/view/53831.
     Google Scholar
  20. Koswara, I. Y. (2020). Malpraktik Kedokteran Perspektif Dokter Dan Pasien Kajian Hukum Dan Kode Etik Kedokteran Indonesia (KODEKI). Yogjakarta: Deepublish. Indonesian.
     Google Scholar
  21. Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and Technique. (2nd ed.). New Delhi: New Age International.
     Google Scholar
  22. Mahdi, M. I. (2022, March 17). Indonesia Miliki 3112 Rumah Sakit pada 2021. dataindonesia.id. Indonesian. https://dataindonesia.id/ragam/detail/indonesia-miliki-3112-rumah-sakit-pada-2021.
     Google Scholar
  23. Mahendradhata, Y., Ahmad, R.A., Lazuardi, L., Wilastonegoro, N.N., Meyati, F., & Sebong, P.H. (2021). Kesehatan Global. Yogjakarta: UGM Press. Indonesian. https://digitalpress.ugm.ac.id/book/280.
     Google Scholar
  24. Mulyadi, D. (2020). Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Kelalaian Medik yang Berkeadilan di Inonesia, Jurnal Logika, 11(2), 126-138. Indonesian. https://journal.uniku.ac.id/index.php/logika/article/view/3125/2021.
     Google Scholar
  25. Muntaha. (2019). Hukum Pidana Malapraktek; Pertanggungjawaban dan Penghapusan Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. Indonesian.
     Google Scholar
  26. Nhamo, G., Dube, K., & Chikodzi, D. (2020). Sustainable Development Goals: Concept and Challenges of Global Development Goal Setting. In: R. Haring, I. Kickbusch, D. Ganten, & M. Moeti (eds). Handbook of Global Health. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05325-3_79-1.
     Google Scholar
  27. Pratama, C. A. E., & Ngadino. (2022). Kedudukan Informed Consent Sebagai Perlindungan Hukum Hubungan Dokter Dan Pasien Dalam Kasus Malpraktek. Notarius 15(1), 241-252. Indonesian. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v15i1.46038.
     Google Scholar
  28. Priyadi, A. (2020). Kontrak Terapeutik/Perjanjian Antara Dokter Dengan Pasien. Jurnal Media Komunikasi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 2(1), 183-192. Indonesian. https://doi.org/10.23887/jmpppkn.v2i1.134
     Google Scholar
  29. Rahmat, A., Pratimaratri, U., & Zaitul. (2021). The Effectiveness of Medical Audits by the Cost Control Quality Control Team in Fraud Prevention in the Implementation of National Health Insurance at BPJS Kesehatan Padang Branch. (Repo No. 3498), [Doctoral Dissertation, Universitas Bung Hatta, Padang]. http://repo.bunghatta.ac.id/3498/.
     Google Scholar
  30. Riyadi, M. (2018). Teori Iknemook dalam Mediasi Malapraktik Medik. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group. Indonesian.
     Google Scholar
  31. Shadmi, E., Chen, Y., Dourado, I., Faran-Perach, I., Furler, J., Hangoma, P., et al. (2020). Health equity and COVID-19: global perspectives. International journal for equity in health, 19(1), 1-16.
     Google Scholar
  32. Soetrisno. (2010) Malpraktik Medik dan Mediasi, Jakarta: YOI BP. Indonesian.
     Google Scholar
  33. Sugianto, F., Simeon, F. C., & Wibowo, D.P. (2020). Idealisasi Sifat Alternatif Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Mediasi. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 3(2), 253-265. Indonesian. https://doi.org/10.30996/jhbbc.v3i2.3525.
     Google Scholar
  34. Sukmawan, Y. A., & Khisni, A. (2019). Legal Protection of Health Workers in the Medical Malpractice Lawsuit in Banjarmasin. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 2(2), 263-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v2i2.5548.
     Google Scholar
  35. Sumeru, F. A. K., & Tanawijaya, H. (2022). Inspanning Verbintenis Dalam Tindakan Medis Yang Dikategorikan Sebagai Tindakan Malpraktek. Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 5(2), 490-512. Indonesian.
     Google Scholar
  36. Sumeru, F. A. K. & Tanawijaya, H. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Diskresi Tindakan Medis dalam Kondisi Kedaruratan yang Dianggap sebagai Tindakan Malpraktek Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Praktik Kedokteran. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling (JPDK), 5(1), 460-467. Indonesian. https://doi.org/10.31004/jpdk.v5i1.10964.
     Google Scholar
  37. Trisnawijayanti, A. A. I. A. N., & Sugama, I. D. G. D. (2020). Mediasi Penal Sebagai Penyelesaian Perkara Alternatif Dalam Malpraktik Di Bidang Kedokteran. Kertha Wicara: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 9(3), 1-16. Indonesian. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthawicara/article/view/57582.
     Google Scholar
  38. Yin, R.K. (2009). Case Study Research Design and Methods. (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks-CA: Sage Publication Inc.
     Google Scholar