Social Media Use and Privacy Concerns: How do College Students view Internet Privacy and Information Protection
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
The study is to prove the intermediary effect of privacy concerns, explore the attitude toward online privacy on social media, and summarize the privacy protection strategies adopted by college students on China's mainland. We used the questionnaire to collect the data from college students. The questionnaire was conducted online and offline, and students at Hebei University were randomly selected as the questionnaire object (n = 304). The results show: (1)Privacy concerns fail to mediate the effect of perceived risks on information protection. (2)Affected by perceived risks, most students are worried about online privacy. (3)The current situation of college students' privacy protection is not optimistic. Finally, the paper summarised some privacy protection strategies for college students.
References
-
Anić, I-D., Škare, V., & Ivana, K.M. (2019). The determinants and effects of online privacy concerns in the context of e-commerce. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 36, 100868-100868.
Google Scholar
1
-
An, Z.Y., & Liu, L.C. (2013). The relationship between SNS users' perceived risks, perceived benefits and privacy concerns. Mathematical practice and understanding, 02, 129-139.
Google Scholar
2
-
Barnes, S.B. (2006). A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday, 11(9).
Google Scholar
3
-
Büchi, M., Just, N. ,& Latzer, M. (2016). Caring is not enough: the importance of Internet skills for online privacy protection. Information, Communication & Society, 20, 1261-1278.
Google Scholar
4
-
Chellappa, R.K.,& Sin, R.G.(2005). Personalization versus Privacy: An Empirical Examination of the Online Consumer's Dilemma. Information Technology and Management, 6(2-3), 181-202.
Google Scholar
5
-
Chen, A.W., & Chen, C.H. (2016). Research on the influence path of personal information disclosure under government supervision. Journal of Chongqing University of science and Technology (SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION), 03, 31-33.
Google Scholar
6
-
Chen, H.T., & Chen, W. (2015). Couldn't or Wouldn't? the Influence of Privacy Concerns and Self-Efficacy in Privacy Management on Privacy Protection. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(1), 13-19.
Google Scholar
7
-
Chen, R. (2013). Living a private life in public social networks: An exploration of member self-disclosure. Decision Support Systems, 55(3), 661-668.
Google Scholar
8
-
Chen, H., Beaudoin, C.E. , & Hong, T. (2017). Securing online privacy: An empirical test on Internet scam victimization, online privacy concerns, and privacy protection behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 291-302.
Google Scholar
9
-
Child, J.T., & Petronio, S. (2011). Unpacking the Paradoxes of Privacy in CMC Relationships: The Challenges of Blogging and Relational Communication on the Internet. Computer-mediated Communication in Personal Relationships.
Google Scholar
10
-
Choi, H., Park, J., & Jung, Y. (2018). The role of privacy fatigue in online privacy behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 42-51.
Google Scholar
11
-
Culnan, M.J., & Armstrong, P.K. (1999). Information Privacy Concerns, Procedural Fairness, and Impersonal Trust: An Empirical Investigation. Organization Science, 10(1) , 104-115.
Google Scholar
12
-
Daniel, J.S. (2008) . The Future of Reputation. Yale: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar
13
-
Dhir, A., Torsheim, T., Pallesen, S., & Andreassen, C.S. (2017). Do Online Privacy Concerns Predict Selfie Behavior among Adolescents, Young Adults and Adults?. Front Psychol, 8, 815.
Google Scholar
14
-
Du, T. (2018). Annual report on the international frontier of private international law (2016-2017). International Law studies, (03), 89-128.
Google Scholar
15
-
Goffman,E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Harmondsworth (Penguin): Doubleday.
Google Scholar
16
-
Haase, A.Q., Ho, D. (2020). Online privacy concerns and privacy protection strategies among older adults in East York, Canada. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(9) , 1089-1102.
Google Scholar
17
-
Hollenbaugh, E.E. (2019). Privacy Management Among Social Media Natives: An Exploratory Study of Facebook and Snapchat. Social Media + Society, 5(3), 395-415.
Google Scholar
18
-
Hozman, D. (2006). Privacy Lost. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
19
-
Laufer, R.S., & Wolfe, M. (1977). Privacy as a Concept and a Social Issue: A Multidimensional Developmental Theory. Journal of Social Issues, 33(3) , 22-42.
Google Scholar
20
-
Lee, H. , Park, H., & Kim, J. (2013). Why do people share their context information on Social Network Services? A qualitative study and an experimental study on users' behavior of balancing perceived benefit and risk. International Journal of Human-computer Studies, 71(9), 862-877.
Google Scholar
21
-
Li, G., & Wang, D.D. (2015). Study on Influencing Factors of users' willingness to disclose personal information on social networking sites: Taking Sina Weibo as an example. Information work, 36(1), 35-40.
Google Scholar
22
-
Lin, A.J., & Cai, M. (2020). Research on the mobile personal data protection under the big-data era. Modern communication: Journal of Communication University of China, 42(04), 79-83.
Google Scholar
23
-
Liu, T., & Deng, S.L. (2018). a review of foreign research on privacy paradox. Journal of Information Resource Management, 8(02), 104-112.
Google Scholar
24
-
Lu, J.Y., & Bai, J. (2021). Research on Chinese youth's Internet privacy concerns and their influencing factors -- Based on an empirical survey of 1599 Communist Youth League members. Journalism Review, 02, 69-79.
Google Scholar
25
-
David,S.,&Manuel, C. (1997). The Rise of the Network Society. Contemporary Sociology, 26(6), 725-725.
Google Scholar
26
-
Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2011). An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transaction. Information Systems Research, 17(1), 61 – 80.
Google Scholar
27
-
Feng, Y., & Xie, W. (2014). Yang Feng and Wenjing Xie. Teens’ concern for privacy when using social networking sites: An analysis of socialization agents and relationships with privacy-protecting behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 153-162.
Google Scholar
28
-
Malhotr, N.K., Kim, S.S., & Agarwal, J. (2004). Internet Users' Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC): The Construct, the Scale, and a Causal Model. Information Systems Research, 15(4), 336-355.
Google Scholar
29
-
Maslow, A.H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396.
Google Scholar
30
-
Milne, G.R., & Culnan, M.J. (2004). Strategies for reducing online privacy risks: Why consumers read (or don’t read) online privacy notices. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 15-29.
Google Scholar
31
-
Mohamed, A. A-A. (2010). Online Privacy Concerns Among Social Networks’ Users. Cross-Cultural Communication, 6(4), 74-89.
Google Scholar
32
-
Moon, Y. (2000). Intimate Exchanges: Using Computers to Elicit Self‐Disclosure From Consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(4), 323-339.
Google Scholar
33
-
Patricia, A.N., Daniel, R.H., & David, A.H. (2007). The Privacy Paradox: Personal Information Disclosure Intentions versus Behaviors. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 41(1), 100-126.
Google Scholar
34
-
Negroponte, N. (1995). Being Digital. New York: Knopf Press.
Google Scholar
35
-
Norsko, A., Wood, E. & Molema, S. (2009). All about me: Disclosure in online social networking profiles: The case of FACEBOOK. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 406-418.
Google Scholar
36
-
Oomen, I., & Leenes, R. (2008). Privacy Risk Perceptions and Privacy Protection Strategies. Boston: Springer Press.
Google Scholar
37
-
Barry Brown(2001). Studying the internet experience. Retrieved from: https://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2001/HPL-2001-49.pdf.
Google Scholar
38
-
Pentina, I., Zhang, L., Bata, H., & Ying, C. (2016). Exploring privacy paradox in information-sensitive mobile app adoption: Across-cultural comparison. Computers in Human Behavior, 65(9), 409 – 419.
Google Scholar
39
-
Petronio, S., & Altman, I. (2002). Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure. New York: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar
40
-
Qin, G.J., & He, D.M. (2011). On the value orientation and dilemma of contemporary privacy ethics. Journal of Shenyang Institute of Engineering (SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION), 2011(3), 9.
Google Scholar
41
-
Quan‐Haase, A., & Ho, D. (2020). Online privacy concerns and privacy protection strategies among older adults in East York, Canada. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(9), 1089-1102.
Google Scholar
42
-
Sarah, A., Johnson, C.M., & D'Souza, G. (2016). The Complex Web of Values: the Impact on Online Privacy Concerns and Purchase Behavior. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 17(1), 22-35.
Google Scholar
43
-
Sayre, S., & Horne, D. (2000). Trading secrets for savings: How concerned are consumers about club cards as a privacy threat?. ACR North American Advances, 27, 151-155.
Google Scholar
44
-
Sheehan, K.B., & Hoy, M.G. (1999). Flaming, complaining, abstaining: how online users respond to privacy concerns. Journal of Advertising, 28(3), 37-51.
Google Scholar
45
-
Shen, Q. (2014). Research on network literacy and network privacy protection behavior: Taking College Students in Shanghai as the research object. Journalism University, (05), 110-118.
Google Scholar
46
-
Shi, S. (2011). Research on the privacy disclosure behavior of social networking website users: the integration of privacy computing theory and TPB model (MBA Thesis). Retrieved from Nanjing University database.
Google Scholar
47
-
Stone, E.F., & Stone, D.L. (1990) . Privacy in organizations: Theoretical issues, research findings, Research progress in Human Resources Management, 8(3), 349-411.
Google Scholar
48
-
Tufekc, Z. (2007). Can You See Me Now? Audience and Disclosure Regulation in Online Social Network Sites. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 28(1), 20-36.
Google Scholar
49
-
Turow, J., & Hennessy, M. (2007). Internet privacy and institutional trust: insights from a national survey. New media & society, 9(2), 300-318.
Google Scholar
50
-
Wang, T., Duong, T.D., & Chen, C.C. (2016). Intention to disclose personal information via mobile applications: A privacy calculus perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 36(4), 531-542.
Google Scholar
51
-
Wu, C.K. (2019). Research on privacy disclosure intention of social media users from the perspective of privacy fatigue (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from Tianjin Normal University database.
Google Scholar
52
-
Wu, H.B.,& Zeng, K. (2023). The transformation of the life world and communication behavior from the perspective of the metauniverse. Journal of Social Sciences, (01), 187-194.
Google Scholar
53
-
Xiang, S.J. (2011). Openness and concealment: Research on privacy in the new media era. Peking: Intellectual property press.
Google Scholar
54
-
Xie, W.H., Chang, Q.Q., & Li, Z.S. (2018). Research progress of Internet privacy paradox abroad -- theoretical integration and review. Modern Intelligence, 38(11), 136-144.
Google Scholar
55
-
Xie, W., & Karan, K. (2019). Consumers’ Privacy Concern and Privacy Protection on Social Network Sites in the Era of Big Data: Empirical Evidence from College Students. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(3), 187-201.
Google Scholar
56
-
Yao, M.Z., Rice, R.E., & Wallis, K. (2007). Predicting user concerns about online privacy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(5), 710-722.
Google Scholar
57
-
Young, A.L., & Quan-Haase, A. (2013). Privacy Protection Strategies On Facebook: The Internet privacy paradox revisited. Information, Communication & Society, 16(4), 479-500.
Google Scholar
58
-
Yuan, Y.X. (2019). Research on media ethics in the era of big data (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from Shanxi University database.
Google Scholar
59
-
Zhang, Y., & Zhu, Q.H. (2014). Review of foreign research on information privacy. Library and information work, 58(13), 140-148.
Google Scholar
60
-
Zhu, H., Wang, K., Yan, Z. J. & Wu, J. (2017). Research on SNS user privacy paradox based on privacy computing theory. Journal of information, 36(02), 134-139.
Google Scholar
61