University Utara, Malaysia
* Corresponding author
University Utara, Malaysia

Article Main Content

This study attempts to examine the knowledge, perceptions, and practices of English language teachers teaching analytical thinking skills in the English reading lesson and investigate the challenges that English language teachers face when incorporating analytical thinking skills in their English reading lessons. Data were collected through a questionnaire administered to 132 English language teachers from 10 National Secondary schools in the district of Kuala Muda, Kedah. In addition, two expert English language teachers’ reading lessons were observed, and post observation interviews were conducted with them. The data collected were analysed using a thematic analysis approach and descriptive statistics. The study found 79% of the participants exhibiting excellent knowledge of analytical thinking skills, while 19% of the participants showed a high level of knowledge and 2% of them had a fair amount of knowledge of analytical thinking skills. All 132 participants indicated positive perceptions of teaching analytical thinking skills in the English reading lessons. Observation of the two expert English language teachers revealed that ‘using open-ended questions, conducting collaborative learning among students, carrying out task-based learning as well as proper lesson planning’ as effective techniques that enhance the teaching of analytical thinking skills. On the other hand, sourcing teaching materials relevant to the topics stipulated in the syllabus and the poor English language proficiency of the students were found to be the major challenges for the two expert English language teachers when teaching analytical thinking skills.

References

  1. Bajunid, I. A.(2008). The Development of Education Leaders in Malaysia: The Creation of a Professional Community. In D. Johnson & R. Maclean (eds.), Teaching: Professionalism, Development and Leadership ( pp.215-232). Springer, Dordrecht.
     Google Scholar
  2. Banda, J.W.S. (2005). Classroom Assessment in Malawi: Teachers’ Perceptions and Practices in Mathematics. [Unpublished Dissertation for partial fulfilment of Doctorate Study]. Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
     Google Scholar
  3. Chickering, A.W., &Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven Principles of Good Teaching in Undergrduate Education. AAHE Bulletin, 39, 3-7.
     Google Scholar
  4. Coffman, D.M. (2013),.Thinking about Thinking. An Exploration of Preservice Teachers’ Views about Higher Order Thinking Skills. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation) University of Kansas.
     Google Scholar
  5. Collins, R (2014). Skills for the 21st century: teaching higher-order thinking. Curriculum and Leadership Journal, 12(14).
     Google Scholar
  6. Hashim, R. (2003). Malaysias Teachers’ Attitudes, Competency and Practices in the Teaching of Thinking. Intellectual Discourses,11(1). https://journal.iium.edu.my/intdiscourse/index.php/islam/article/view/245
     Google Scholar
  7. Hargreaves, A. (2003), Teaching in the Knowledge Society. Education in the Age of Insecurity. New York : Teachers’ CollegePress.
     Google Scholar
  8. Haryati, O.B., Helena, P., Julyana, M.M., Annisa, N. D. (2015). Enhancing Higher Order Thinking Skills in Representing and Interpreting Data Through Problem Based Learning. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in SouthEast Asia, 32(2).
     Google Scholar
  9. JapanTimes (2014, Jan 10).Teachers Must Nurture Critical Thinking; Confidence. Retrieved from: https://www.japantimes.co.jp.
     Google Scholar
  10. Kagan, S. (2003). Kagan Structures for Thinking Skills.San Clemente, CA: Kagan Publishing.
     Google Scholar
  11. Lau, J.Y.F. (2015). Metacognitive Education: Going Beyond Critical Thinking. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. Palgrave.
     Google Scholar
  12. Malaysia Ministry of Education (2013). Executive Summary: The Malaysian Educational Blue Print (2013-2025).
     Google Scholar
  13. Malaysia Ministry of Education, English Language Syllabus Secondary Form 1, p.3
     Google Scholar
  14. Nawal, S. (2018, April 8). Key to the Higher order Thinking Skills. The STAR Online. Retrieved from:https://www.thestar.my.
     Google Scholar
  15. Pitiporntapin, S. & Sadler,T. D. (2014). Socio-scientific Issue-Based Teaching (SIT) Questionnaire.
     Google Scholar
  16. Pitiporntapin, S. & Sadler, T.D. (2015). Preservice Science Teachers’ Perceptions and Practices of Socioscientific Issue-based Teaching. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 38(2), 102-125.
     Google Scholar
  17. Rajendran, N.S. (2001). Language Teaching and the enhancement of higher-order thinking skills. In: Language Curriculum and Instruction in Multicultural Societies–Anthology series 42. Renandaya, W. A. & Sunga, N. R. (Eds.) Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
     Google Scholar
  18. Rosmawati, J. (2009). The Teaching of Higher Order Thinking Skills in English Language Classroom: Where Are We? [Unpublished Masters’ Theses].Universiti Utara Malaysia.
     Google Scholar
  19. Snyder, L., & Snyder, M. (2008). Teaching critical thinking and problem solving skills. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 50, 90-99.
     Google Scholar
  20. Tan, Y.P. & Mohamad, Y.A. (2014). Teacher and Student Questions: A Case Study in Malaysian Secondary School Problem-based Learning. Canadian Centre of Science and Education, 10(4), 174-182.
     Google Scholar
  21. Tan, S. Y. & Siti Hajar,H. (2015). Effective Teaching of Higher Order Thinking Skills. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-learning, 3(2). Retrieved from: https://www.tojdel.net.
     Google Scholar
  22. Thu, T.H. (2009). Teachers’ Perception about Grammar Teaching. Retrieved from: https://eric.edu.govwww.academypublication.com/o/tpls/vol07.
     Google Scholar
  23. Tengku Nor Rizan T.M.M., Nooreiny M., Hamidah Y., Effendi, Z. (2012). An Investigation of Teachers’ Pedagogical Skills and Content-knowledge in a Content-based Instruction Context. CONAPLIN JOURNAL. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics., 2012 Jan, 1(2), 75-90. https://www.researchgate.net DOI:10.1750/ijal.v1i2.86.
     Google Scholar
  24. Wenglinhsky, H. (2002). How Schools Matter. The link between teacher classroom practices and student academic performance. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(12). http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n12/.
     Google Scholar
  25. William, M., & Burden, R. L. (1997). Psychology for Language Teachers: A Social Constructivist Approach. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
     Google Scholar
  26. Yu, R. & Singh, K. (2018). Teacher Support, Instructional Practices, Student Motivation, and Mathematics Achievement in High School. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(1), 81-94.
     Google Scholar