The Changes and Continuities Between the Ottoman Empire and the Turkish Republic
Article Main Content
The transformation of the Ottoman Empire into the Turkish Republic was accompanied by change and continuities. The newly founded early republics necessarily inherited relics from the previous era and were significantly affected by economic and social institutions that sculpted their personality and mannerisms. This paper reveals the connection between the subjectivity of the late Ottoman and early Turkish republics through four aspects: state traditions, bureaucracy, the role of the military, and political culture, with both innovative changes and continuities. These connections facilitate comprehension of the early republic's history, political actors, and notable events.
References
-
Barchard, X. E. & Barchard, D. (2002). Society and bureaucracy the civil service. In B. Beeley (Eds.), Turkish Transformation New Century New Challenges, pp. 198–219. Eothen Press.
Google Scholar
1
-
Başkan, F., Gümrükçü, S. B., & Canyaş, F. O. (2022). Forming pre-electoral coalitions in competitive authoritarian contexts: The case of the 2018 parliamentary elections in Turkey. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 24, 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2021.2006006.
Google Scholar
2
-
Casanova, J. (2006). Religion, European secular identities, and European integration. In T. A. Byrnes & P. J. Katzenstein (Eds.), Religion in an Expanding Europe (pp. 65–92). Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
3
-
Demir, Ö., Acar, M., & Toprak, M. (2004). Anatolian tigers or Islamic capital: Prospects and challenges. Middle Eastern Studies, 40(6), 166–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/0026320042000282937.
Google Scholar
4
-
Eslen-Ziya, H., & Korkut, U. (2010). Political religion and politicized women in turkey: Hegemonic republicanism revisited. Totalitarian Movements & Political Religions, 11(3–4), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/14690764.2010.546088.
Google Scholar
5
-
Esmer, Y. (2002). At the ballot box: Determinants of voting behavior. In Y. Esmer (Eds.), Politics, Parties, and Elections in Turkey (pp. 91–114). Lynne Rienner Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781588261878-006.
Google Scholar
6
-
Göle, N. (1997). Secularism and islamism in turkey: The making of elites and counter-elites. Middle East Journal, 51(1), 46–58. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4329022.
Google Scholar
7
-
Gürsoy, Y. (2012) The changing role of the military in turkish politics: democratization through coup plots? Democratization 19, 735–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.623352.
Google Scholar
8
-
Heper, M. (1985). The state tradition in Turkey. Eothen Press.
Google Scholar
9
-
Heper, M. (1987). State, democracy, and bureaucracy in Turkey. In M. Heper (Eds.), The State and Public Bureaucracies. A comparative perspective (pp. 131–145). Greenwood Press.
Google Scholar
10
-
Kadıoğlu, A. (2010). The pathologies of turkish republican laicism. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 36(3-4), 489–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453709358835.
Google Scholar
11
-
Karaosmanoǧlu, A. L. (2000). The evolution of the national security culture and the military in Turkey. Journal of International Affairs, 199-216.
Google Scholar
12
-
Norman, Y. A. (2011). Disputing the “iron circle”: Renan, Afghani, and Kemal on Islam, science, and modernity. Journal of World History: Official Journal of the World History Association, 22(4), 693–714. https://doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2011.0107.
Google Scholar
13
-
Özbudun, E. (1988). The development of representative and democratic government. In E. Özbudun (Eds.), Perspectives on democracy in Turkey (pp. 198–219). Turkish Political Science Association.
Google Scholar
14
-
Özbudun, E. (1993). State elites and democratic political culture in turkey. In L.J. Diamond (Eds.), Political culture and democracy in developing countries (pp. 189–210). Lynne Rienner Publications.
Google Scholar
15
-
Parla. (2021). The social and political thought of Ziya gökalp, 1876-1924. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004491632.
Google Scholar
16
-
Sakallioglu, U. C. (1997). The anatomy of the Turkish military’s political autonomy. Comparative Politics, 29(2), 151. https://doi.org/10.2307/422077.
Google Scholar
17
-
Sayari, S., & Dikici-Bilgin, H. (2011). Paths to power: The making of cabinet ministers in turkey. Parliamentary Affairs, 64(4), 737–762. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsr017.
Google Scholar
18
-
Shell, S. M. (1994). Recognition: Fichte and Hegel on the other (review). Journal of the History of Philosophy, 32(1), 146–148. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.1994.0006.
Google Scholar
19
-
Turan, İ (1991). Religion and political culture in turkey. In R. Tapper (Eds.), Islam in modern Turkey: religion, politics and literature in a secular state (pp. 31–55). IB Tauris.
Google Scholar
20
-
Turan, İ. (2019). Continuity and change in Turkish bureaucracy: The kemalist period and after. In Atatürk and the Modernization of Turkey (pp. 99–121). Routledge.
Google Scholar
21
-
Vali, F. A. (2020). Bridge across the Bosporus: The foreign policy of turkey. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar
22
-
Yanikdag, Y., & Karpat, K. H. (2001). Ottoman past and today’s turkey. The Journal of Military History, 65(2), 525. https://doi.org/10.2307/2677211.
Google Scholar
23
-
Yavuz, M. H. (2009). Secularism Muslim democracy Turkey. Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
24
-
Yildiz, U. B. (2014). Rethinking civil–military relations in turkey: The problems of the democratic governance of the defense and security sectors. Turkish Studies, 15(3), 386–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2014.954744.
Google Scholar
25
-
Younis, T., Ibrahim, S. A. M., & McLean, M. A. (1992). Administrative development and reform in Turkey: A historical overview (part I). International Journal of Public Sector Management, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/09513559210008723.
Google Scholar
26