Tribhuvan University, Nepal.
* Corresponding author

Article Main Content

This research paper aims to explore resistance of chief female characters, Satyawatee, Gandharee, and Draupadi, in Nilam Karki Niharika’s novel, Cheerharan, against the deprivation of economic, social, and cultural rights of women in the male-dominated Nepalese society. Satyawatee and Gandharee are victimized by patriarchy and portrayed as submissive. But Draupadi resists against the victimization of women in the novel. In an identical way, some women have internalized sexism in Nepalese society while others have objected to this. Draupadi, the chief character of Cheerharan, acts as an adamant feminist to revolt against the treatment of Nepali women as the inferior sex. The theoretical tools taken to explore the assumed truth are the feminists’ ideologies developed by such radical feminists as Simone de Beauvoir and Virginia Woolf. The study demonstrates that Cheerharan is the depiction of the pathetic condition of the Nepalese women which has not changed significantly from the ancient time to the present time. The chief finding of the paper is that Satyawatee and Gandharee, like most of Nepali women, know the ill practices of men but can’t resist against them because they take the socialization process for granted; while Drupadi, like a bold modern Nepali woman, reacts against the ill-practices of males towards females. It is assumed that the researchers intending to explore Nepali literature from the feminist perspective can take the paper as a reference.

References

  1. Abram, M. H. (2008). A glossary of literary terms (8th Ed.). Magic International Printer.
     Google Scholar
  2. Atam, N., & Baral, K. H. (1999). Upanyas siddhanth ra Nepali upanyas [Novel principles and Nepali novels]. Sajha Prakashan.
     Google Scholar
  3. Baniya, Raj K. (2016, October 29). Mahabharatko naari sanskar [Female cult of Mahabharat]. Kantipur Daily, 11.
     Google Scholar
  4. Beauvoir, S. d. (1983). The second sex (H. M. Parshley, Trans.). Penguine.
     Google Scholar
  5. Bhusal, R. (2016, August, 29). Mahabharatko nawakathan [New tale of Mahabharat]. Annapurna Post, 12.
     Google Scholar
  6. Bista, A. (2019). Exploration of gender role in Bisheswar Prasad Koirala’s tinghumti. JODEM: Journal of Language and Literature, 10(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.3126/jodem.v10i1.30395.
     Google Scholar
  7. Brickwell, C. (2005, July). Masculinities, performativity, and subversion: A sociological reappraisal. Men and Masculinities, 8(1) 24-43. DOI: 10.1177/1097184X03257515.
     Google Scholar
  8. Bryson, V. (1986). Feminist political theory. Paragon House.
     Google Scholar
  9. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  10. Delphy, C. (1984). Close to home: A materialist analysis of women’s oppression (D. Leonard, Trans.). Hutchinson.
     Google Scholar
  11. Dhaiba, J. (2016, July 17). Mahilako lagi singo sansar asurakhsit chha [Whole world is insecure for women]. Onlinekhabar.
     Google Scholar
  12. http: //www.onlinekhabar.com.
     Google Scholar
  13. Ghimire, S. (2016, June 17). Nari adhikar bhandai pariwar kshat-vikshat banaudina [Won’t let family ruined in the name of female rights]. Setopati. http://kala.setopati.com/news/3833/
     Google Scholar
  14. Magar, Sant G. (2016, August, 17). Mahabharatko marmik tasbir [Terrible picture of Mahabharat]. Himal Khabarpatika, 21.
     Google Scholar
  15. Mahara, J. (2016, August 6). Dinadinai batoma bhetinchhan Draupadiharu [Druapadis are met on the road daily]. Thahamhabar. https: // www. thahakhabar.som//
     Google Scholar
  16. Mishra, Indira A. (2021). Representation of masculinity in Govinda Raj Bhattarai's Muglan. JODEM: Journal of Language and Literature,12(1), 44-58. https://doi.org/10.3126/jodem.v12i1.38716.
     Google Scholar
  17. Moi, T. (1985). Sexual/textual politics: Feminist literary theory. Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  18. Morrell, R., & Swart, S. (2005). Men in the third world: postcolonial perspectives on masculinity. In M. Kimmel (Ed.), Handbook of studies on men & masculinities. Sage Publications.
     Google Scholar
  19. Niharika, Nilam K. (2016). Cheerharan. Sangrila Prakasan.
     Google Scholar
  20. Pokharel, J. (2016, August 6). Purushasattako pardaphas [Pulling the curtain of masculinity]. Nagarik https://nagariknews.com/news/3206/
     Google Scholar
  21. Rich, A. (1995). Of woman born: Motherhood as experience and institution. Rutgers University Press.
     Google Scholar
  22. Ruth, S. (1990). Issues in feminism: An introduction to women’s studies. Mayfield Publishing Company.
     Google Scholar
  23. Sawyer, J. (2004). On male liberation. In P. F. Murphy (Ed.), Feminism and Masculinity (pp. 25-27). University of Pittsburgh.
     Google Scholar
  24. Shrivastwa, B. K. (2022). Archetypal manifestation of matriarchy in the post-depression era in Steinbeck’s the grapes of wrath. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt / Egyptology, 19(1), 117-128.
     Google Scholar
  25. https://archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/view/10691
     Google Scholar
  26. Subedi, R. (2007). Nepali upanyasa: Parampara ra prabriti [Nepali novel: Tradition and trend] (3rd Ed.). Sajha.
     Google Scholar
  27. Tyson, L. (2006). Critical theory today: A user friendly guide. Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  28. Uprety, S. (2016). Triple headed patriarchal Hydra: Masculinities and violence against women in Nepal. Sociology and Anthropology, 4(7), 509-522. http://www.hrpub.org. Doi:10.13189/sa.2016.040701.
     Google Scholar
  29. Wollstonecraft, M. (1992). A vindication of the rights of the women. In H. Adams (Ed.), Critical theory since Plato (pp. 256-259). Harcourt Brace.
     Google Scholar
  30. Woolf, V. (1992). A room of one’s own. In H. Adams (Ed.), Critical theory since Plato (pp. 243-246). Harcout Brace.
     Google Scholar