##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

This study sought to find out the state of the structures of quality assurance practices in Colleges of Education in Ghana. It specifically explored the sociological variables and the challenges associated with ensuring quality assurance practices in the management of the Colleges of Education. The design for the research was   non experimental descriptive survey and data were gathered through the use of questionnaires. There were 3 sets of questionnaires one for each group namely principals, tutors and students of five colleges of education. Each of the questionnaires were validated and their reliability tested with a Cronbach’s co efficient alpha of 0.829 for the students and 0.914 for the tutors. The results were an indication of good reliability estimate. In all, 5 principals, 180 tutors and 1,153 students were given the questionnaires. Findings from the study suggested that students admitted to the Colleges enter with poor grades. The libraries are also not well-equipped for students and tutors to support quality teaching and learning. The study also found out that the professional experience of tutors in the Colleges was excellent. Based on the findings, it is recommended that, firstly, admissions should be based on the Ghana Tertiary Education (GTEC) requirements for tertiary institutions. Secondly, principals should be encouraged to attend institutional management courses to improve upon their management styles. Thirdly, adequate financial resources should be allocated to the Library so that current books, journals and reference books can be purchased to improve teaching and learning. Fourthly, quality assurance units should be established in the Colleges to ensure quality.

 

References

  1. AAU (2008). QualityAssurance in HigherEducation. Accessed on 21 August, 2012 from researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10063/2024/thesis.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  2. Aly, N. and Akpovi, J. (2001) Total Quality Management in California Public Higher Education. Quality Assurance in Education, 9(3)127 -131.
     Google Scholar
  3. Ankomah, Y.A., Koomson, J.A., Bosu, R.S. & Oduro, G.K.T. (2005). A Review on the concept of Quality Education: Perspectives from Ghana. EdQual Working Paper No. 1. University of Cape Coast, Ghana.
     Google Scholar
  4. Askling, B. (1997) Quality Monitoring as an Institutional Enterprise, Quality in Higher Education, 3(1).
     Google Scholar
  5. Colleges of Education Act, (2012). Act 847. GPCL/A397/350/4/2012.
     Google Scholar
  6. Dano, T, & Stensaker, B. (2007). Still Balancing Improvement and Accountability? Developments in External Quality Assurance in the Nordic Countries 1996-2006. Quality in Higher Education, 13(1), 81-93.
     Google Scholar
  7. Education Act, (2008). Act 778. Gazette 9th January, 2009. GHA-2008-L-83622.
     Google Scholar
  8. Finish Higher Education Evaluation Council. (2008). Audits of quality assurance systems of Finish higher education institutions. Audit manual for 2008-2011. Retrieved 29 Nov, 2010, from http://www.kka.fi/pdf/julkaisut/kka1007.pdf
     Google Scholar
  9. Gay, L. R. (1987). Educational research: competencies for analysis and application. Merrill Publication Company.
     Google Scholar
  10. Hall, C. (2006). Quality assurance in education. Unpublished manuscript. Psychology and Pedagogy. Victoria University of Wellington. Wellington, New Zealand.
     Google Scholar
  11. Lomas, L. (2002). Does the development of mass education necessarily mean the end of quality. Quality in Higher Education, 8(1), 71-79.
     Google Scholar
  12. Manyaga, T. (2008). Standards to assure quality in tertiary education: The case of Tanzania. An International Perspective, 16(2), 164-180.
     Google Scholar
  13. Materu, P. (2007). Higher Education Quality Assurance in Sub-Saharan Africa: Status, Challenges, Opportunities and Promising Practices. Washington, World Bank, Paper No. 124.
     Google Scholar
  14. McMillan, J. H. (1996). Educational research: fundamentals for the consumer, 2nd edn. New York, HarperCollins College Publishers
     Google Scholar
  15. QAA (2004) Code of practice for the assurance of academic quality and standards in higher education. Section 2: Collaborative provision and flexible and distributed learning (including e-learning). Adamsway Mansfield, Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education Ltd.
     Google Scholar
  16. Stensaker, B., Brandt, E., & Solum, N. H. (2008). Changing systems of external examination. Quality Assurance in Education,16(3), 211-223.
     Google Scholar
  17. Tsinidon et al. (2010). Evaluation of the factors that determine quality in higher education: an empirical study. Quality Assurance in Education,18(3), 227-44.
     Google Scholar
  18. Vroeijenstijn, A.I. (1995). Improvement and accountability: navigating between Scylla and Charybdis. Higher Education Policy Series 30
     Google Scholar
  19. Watty, K. (2003). When will Academics Learn about Quality? Quality in Higher Education, 9(3), 213-221.
     Google Scholar
  20. Woodhouse, D. (1999). Quality and Quality Assurance. H.d. Wit & J. A. Knight (Eds.), Quality and Internationalisation in Higher Education (pp.29-44), OECD, Paris, France.
     Google Scholar