Effectiveness of Learning Activities in the Pandemic and Post Pandemic Era
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
For over two years, home learning during a pandemic has been experienced by almost all schools globally. Learning during a pandemic impacts not only teaching and learning in schools but also the load of learning materials that teachers must convey to students. Online learning becomes the choice as almost all teachers are encouraged to work from home, with students also having to learn from home. No one knows how long it will last and when it will end. Facts show that during a pandemic, not all students have the ability or capability to take online lessons. Additionally, teachers are also burdened with paying for the internet connection to teach, while basic needs such as food and clothing during the pandemic stay unfulfilled due to economic difficulties from the pandemic. In this study, a study was carried out to determine the level of learning effectiveness during a pandemic. Over 200 high school students became respondents in the study, and 50 teachers gave their opinions through questionnaires and interviews. The researchers used three analyses to identify the required strategic steps: performance analysis, GAP analysis, and the Analysis of Standards-Importance-Advice-Performance (ASIAP). The results were quite surprising, showing that most students want to return to school and follow normal learning, mainly due to internet connectivity issues and feeling that the non-interactive online learning materials are more difficult to understand. Another concern is that only a small number of students can concentrate well in the online learning process, while the remaining learning activities are mixed between school activities, home activities, and other unavoidable activities.
References
-
Abalo, J., Varela, J. and Manzano, V. (2007). Importance values for Importance-Performance Analysis: A formula for spreading out values derived from preference rankings, Journal of Business Research, 60(2), 115-121.
Google Scholar
1
-
Chalim, A. S. (2016). 3D IPEA Model to Improving the Service Quality of Boarding School, Asian Social Science, 12(7), 119-128.
Google Scholar
2
-
Chen, Y. C. & Lin, S. (2013). Applying Importance-Performance Analysis for Improving Internal Marketing of Hospital Management in Taiwan International. Business Research, 6(4), 46-54.
Google Scholar
3
-
Cilliers, E. & Timmermans, W. (2014). The importance of creative participatory planning in the public place-making process. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 41(3), pp. 413-429.
Google Scholar
4
-
Cronin, J. J. & Taylor, S. A. (1992). Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension. Journal of Marketing, 56(3), 55-68.
Google Scholar
5
-
Dewi, W. A. F. (2020). The Impact of Covid 19 on the Implementation of Online Learning in Primary Schools. EDUKATIF, 2(1), https://edukatif.org/index.php/edukatif /article/view/89 (Indonesian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v2i1.89
Google Scholar
6
-
Ennew, C.T., Reed, G.V. and Binks, M.R. (1993). Importance-performance analysis and the measurement of service quality. European Journal of Marketing, 27, pp. 59-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090569310026402
Google Scholar
7
-
Herliandry, L. D., Nurhasanah, N., Suban , M. E., & Kuswanto, H. (2020). Pembelajaran Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 (Lessons During the Covid-19 Pandemic). JTP - Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 22(1), 65-70. (in Indonesian) https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v22i1.15286
Google Scholar
8
-
Kitcharoen, K. (2004), The importance-performance analysis of service quality in administrative departments of private universities in Thailand. ABAC Journal, 24(3), 20-46.
Google Scholar
9
-
Lin, S. P., Chan, Y. H. and Tsai, M. C. (2009). A Transformation Function Corresponding to IPA and Gap Analysis. TQM & Business Excellence, 20(8), 829-846.
Google Scholar
10
-
Lin, S. P., Chan, Y. H., Tsai, M. C. (2009). A transformation function corresponding to IPA and gap analysis. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 20(7), 829-846.
Google Scholar
11
-
Linda, S. L., & To, W. M. (2010). Importance-performance analysis for public management decision making: An empirical study of China's special administrative region. Management Decision, 48 (2), 277-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251741011022626
Google Scholar
12
-
Martilla, J. A., & James, J. C. (1977). Importance-performance analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41, 77-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1250495
Google Scholar
13
-
Matzler, K., Sauerwein, E. and Heischmidt, K. (2003). Importance-performance analysis Revisited: the role of the factor structure of customer satisfaction. The Service Industries Journal, 23(2), 112-129.
Google Scholar
14
-
Ronzhina, N., Kondyurina, I., Voronina, A., Igishev, K., Loginova, N. (2021). Digitalization of Modern Education: Problems and Solutions. International Journal of Emerging Technology in Learning, 16(4), 122-135. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i04.18203
Google Scholar
15
-
Sadikin, A. & Hamidah, A. (2020). Online Learning in the Middle of the Covid-19 Pandemic. BIODIK, 6(2), 214-224.
Google Scholar
16
-
Silva, F. & Fernandes, O. (2010). Using Importance-Performance Analysis in Evaluating of Higher Education: A Case Study. ICEMT 2010 International Conference on Education and Management Technology. IEEE. ISBN: 978-1-4244-8617-5, 121-123.
Google Scholar
17
-
Silva, F. & Fernandes, O. (2011) Importance-Performance Analysis As A Tool In Evaluating Higher Education Service Quality: The Empirical Results Of Estig (IPB. Creating Global Competitive Economies: A 360-Degree Approach, 306-315.
Google Scholar
18
-
Usman, F., Murakami, K., Deguchi, C., Cahyaning, I. (2019). Information and Communication Technology in Tsunami Disaster Mitigation related to Evacuation. Disaster Advances, 12(3), 1-5.
Google Scholar
19
-
Wong, M. S., Hideki, N., & George, P. (2011). The use of importance-performance analysis (IPA) in evaluating Japan's e-government services. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 6(2), 17-30.
Google Scholar
20
-
Wu, H. H., & Shieh, J. I. (2010). Quantifying uncertainty in applying importance-performance analysis. Quality and Quantity, 44, 997-1003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-009-9245-8
Google Scholar
21