Teaching ESL Writing in Saudi Arabia: A Case for the Integration of Peer Feedback



Abstract Views
547

Downloads
403

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Oct 30, 2021
Published Dec 10, 2021
10.24018/ejsocial.2021.1.6.175

Abstract viewed = 547 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Writing is the most difficult of all language skills and the one learned last. This is true regardless of L1 or L2 but, for many reasons, it is especially true when it comes to learning to write in a second or foreign language. Furthermore, available data shows that English as a Second Language (ESL) Saudi students are among the lowest-scoring in the world, especially when it comes to writing. In this project, we investigate deploying alternative sources of feedback in ESL writing classes, including peer feedback, with the aim of improving writing. We also investigate Saudi students’ perception of peer feedback. Data was collected using a questionnaire and pre- and post-test written exams involving control and experimental groups. Descriptive statistics from both methods were generated and presented accordingly. It was found that peer feedback provided an additional source of constructive feedback and fostered autonomous learning.

Keywords: ESL Writing, Peer Feedback, Writing Problems

References

  1. Akhtar, R., Hassan, H., Saidalvi, A., Hussain, S. (2019). A systematic review of the challenges and solutions of ESL students’ academic writing. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(5), 1169-1171.
     Google Scholar
  2. Assalahi, H. M. (2013). Why Is the Grammar-translation Method Still Alive in the Arab World? Teachers’ Beliefs and Its implications for EFL Teacher Education. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 3(4).
     Google Scholar
  3. Bhatti, A. M., Hussain, Z., Azim, M. U., Gulfam, G. Q. (2020). Perceptions of ESL learners and teachers on writing difficulties in English language learning in Lahore. International Bulletin of Linguistics and Literature (IBLL), 3(3), 11-24.
     Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (6th Edition), London: Routledge Flamer.
     Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K. (2000). Research Methods in Education (5th Edition). London: Routledge Falmer.
     Google Scholar
  6. Eissa, S. A. H. (2016). The Impact of Using Grammar Translation Method on the Performance of Saudi Secondary School Students [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Sudan University of Science and Technology.
     Google Scholar
  7. Flower, L., & Hayes, J.R. (1980). Identifying the Organization of Writing Processes. In L. Gregg & E. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive Processes in Writing (pp.3-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     Google Scholar
  8. Grami, G. M. A. (2010). The effects of integrating peer feedback into university-level ESL writing curriculum: A comparative study in a Saudi context [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Newcastle University.
     Google Scholar
  9. Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of second language writing, 12(1), 17-29.
     Google Scholar
  10. Ien, L. K., Yunus, M. M., Embi, M. A. (2017). Build me up: Overcoming writing problems among pupils in a rural primary school in Belaga, Sarawak, Malaysia. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 5(1), 1-7.
     Google Scholar
  11. Moses, R. N., & Mohamad, M. (2019). Challenges faced by students and teachers on writing skills in ESL Contexts: A literature review. Creative Education, 10(13), 3385-3391.
     Google Scholar
  12. Mubarak, A. A. (2017). An investigation of academic writing problems level faced by undergraduate students at Al Imam Al Mahdi University-Sudan. English Review: Journal of English Education, 5(2), 175-188.
     Google Scholar
  13. Nunan, T. (2000). Exploring the Concept of Flexibility. In V. Jakupec and J. Garrick (Eds.), Flexible Learning, Human Resource and Organizational Development: Putting Theory to Work (pp.47-66). London: Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  14. Paulus, T. M. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of second language writing, 8(3), 265-289.
     Google Scholar
  15. Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT journal, 59(1), 23-30.
     Google Scholar
  16. Zacharias, N. T. (2007). Teacher and student attitudes toward teacher feedback. RELC journal, 38(1), 38-52.
     Google Scholar
  17. Zhang, S. (1995). Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class. Journal of second language writing, 4(3), 209-222.
     Google Scholar
  18. Zhao, H. (2010). Investigating learners’ use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing: A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom. Assessing writing, 15(1), 3-17.
     Google Scholar