An Examination of Barriers of Criminal Information Sharing Between Law Enforcement Agencies and Their Effect in Crimes Management in Nairobi County, Kenya
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
The paper examined barriers of criminal information sharing between law enforcement agencies and their effect in crimes management in Nairobi County, Kenya, using data from an MA Thesis. This study was guided by four objectives; to examine the types of criminal information that is shared among law enforcement agencies; to assess the individual, organizational and technological barriers that hinders sharing of criminal information among law enforcement agencies in Nairobi County, Kenya. This study was guided by Social Exchange Theory as propounded by Homans in (1958). This study adopted a qualitative study design and non-probabilistic sample design paradigms. The main method of data collection was the interview. Interview schedule and key informants guide were used to collect data. A sample comprised of 47 law enforcement officers purposively selected from Directorate of criminal Investigation (DCI) Operation wing and the Kenya Police Service Headquarters operation wing. In addition, 10 Key informants were also purposively selected and interviewed to inform the study. Both individual barriers, organizational and technological barriers affected criminal information sharing among law enforcement agencies. Major individual barrier was competition for credit between the agencies in achieving positive outcomes which was perceived to have a backlash on security operations. Other individual barriers included the deeply entrenched culture of secrecy and the need-to-know rather than the need to share policy. Major organizational barriers include Mistrust of other organizations (89.1%), Organizational culture such as culture of secrecy (83.2%). Major technological barriers included both intra and inter-information technological gaps exacerbated by wanting levels of information technology skills. The barriers were perceived to cause 'linkage blindness,' where the information available in one agency is not available with other law enforcement agencies affecting remarkable achievement of outcomes. As a policy measure, the study recommended speedy removal of criminal information barriers at all levels and fast mitigation on both intra and inter-organizational information technological skill gaps. The deeply entrenched culture of secrecy and the need-to-know rather than the need to share information policy should further be re-visited and dealt with. Finally, there is an urgent need for National-wide Criminal Information Management System with certain rights for all law enforcement agencies. The use of a database will reduce the technological barrier since criminal information will be made accessible to all the agencies
References
-
The United States Department of Justice, 2009.
Google Scholar
1
-
“United States Declaration of Independence”. Inalienable Universal Human Rights, July 4, 1776.
Google Scholar
2
-
Kenya, “The constitution”. Nairobi: Government Printer, 2010.
Google Scholar
3
-
Gottschalk, P. & Dean, G., “Stages of knowledge management systems in policing financial crime”. International Journal of Law Crime and Justice, 38, 94-108, 2010.
Google Scholar
4
-
Ratcliffe, J. H., “Intelligence-led policing”. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, 248, 1-6, 2012.
Google Scholar
5
-
Best Jr's 9/11 terrorist attacks
Google Scholar
6
-
Campbell (1996)
Google Scholar
7
-
Government of Canada, 2010
Google Scholar
8
-
Oppal, 2012
Google Scholar
9
-
US Office of Homeland Security (2007)
Google Scholar
10
-
Lake, D. A & Morgan, P.M eds, “Regional Orders: Building Security in a New World”. The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1997.
Google Scholar
11
-
Adams, R., Rohe, W.M., & Arcury, T.A., “Implementing community-oriented policing: Organizational change and street officer attitudes”. Crime and Delinquency, 48, 399- 430, 2002.
Google Scholar
12
-
Chappell, 2009
Google Scholar
13
-
Baylis, Wirtz and Gray (2013)
Google Scholar
14
-
The New Times, 2015
Google Scholar
15
-
Lake and Morgan (1993: 8),
Google Scholar
16
-
BBC, 2015
Google Scholar
17
-
NCIC database, US Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation Washington D.C., 2000.
Google Scholar
18
-
Bittner, E., “The functions of the Police in Modern Society”. Chevy Chase, Maryland: National Institute of Mental Health, 1970.
Google Scholar
19
-
Reiss, 1992
Google Scholar
20
-
Van Maanen, J., Police Socialization: A longitudinal Examination of Job Attitudes in an urban Police Department Administrative Science Quarterly, 20(2), 207-228, 1975.
Google Scholar
21
-
Chan, J., “The technological game: How information technology is transforming police practice”. Criminal Justice, 1(2): 139-159, 2001.
Google Scholar
22
-
Koper, C., Lum, C. & Willis, J., “Optimizing the use of Technology in Policing: Results and implications from a multi-site study of the social, organizational, and behavioural aspects of implementing police technologies”. Policing, 8(2): 212-221, 2014.
Google Scholar
23
-
Manning, P.K., “Information technologies and the police”. Crime and Justice, 15, 349-398, 1992.
Google Scholar
24
-
Sheptycki, J., “High Policing in the Security Control Society”. A Journal of Policy and Practice, Volume 1, Issue 1, 70–79, 2007.
Google Scholar
25
-
Haggerty, Kevin D., &Richard V. Ericson, “The Surveillant Assemblage”. The British Journal of Sociology, 51(4): 605–622, 2000.
Google Scholar
26
-
Marenin, O., “Building a global police studies community”. Police Quarterly, 8, 99-136, 2005.
Google Scholar
27
-
Reid, 2013
Google Scholar
28
-
Jones, T. & Newburn, T., “Policy convergence, politics and comparative penal reform: Sex offender notification schemes in the USA and UK”. Punishment and Society, 15(5): 439-467, 2013.
Google Scholar
29
-
Haberfeld, M., McDonald, W. & Hassell, A. “International Cooperation in Policing: a partial answer to the query?”. In M. Haberfeld & M. Cerrah (Eds), Comparative Policing, the struggle for democratization. London: Sage, 341-371, 2008.
Google Scholar
30
-
Dolowitz and Marsh, 2000
Google Scholar
31
-
Versaterm, 2010
Google Scholar
32
-
Manning, 2003
Google Scholar
33
-
Sorensen, C & Pica, D, “Tales from the police: Rhythms of interaction with mobile technologies”. Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK, 2005.
Google Scholar
34
-
Jackson, D. L., “Revisiting sample size and the number of parameter estimates: Some support for the N:q hypothesis”. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 128–141, 2003.
Google Scholar
35
-
Orodho, A. J. & Kombo, D.K., Research Methods: Nairobi: Kenyatta University, 2002.
Google Scholar
36
-
Mugenda, M. O. & Mugenda, G.A., “Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches”. Nairobi: African Centre for Technology Studies, 2003.
Google Scholar
37