Implications of Gender Stereotypes on Community Development Initiatives in Dadaab, Garissa County, Kenya



Abstract Views
526

Downloads
408

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Jul 25, 2021
Published Apr 22, 2022
10.24018/ejsocial.2022.2.2.114

Abstract viewed = 526 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

This paper examined the implications of gender stereotypes on community development initiatives in Dadaab region of Garissa County in Kenya using data collected for an MA Thesis. The paper has been motivated by increased perceptions that gender stereotyping has continued to bar development especially in developing countries such as Kenya. The Specific objectives of this study were; to examine how socially-constructed gender norms influence community development in Dadaab Sub County, to explore how religious beliefs on gender influence community development, and to assess the influence of cultural beliefs on gender in community development in Dadaab Sub County. The study adopted correlational design which engaged 293 men and women respondents selected through Convenience sampling. Social role and gender schema theories were used to explain behavior of men and women based on societal expectations and the process of gender construction and maintenance through cognitive organization and interpretation. Data was collected using focus groups and interview schedule. The study found out that men and women had divided roles where responsibilities for men in the families included; protecting the families from danger, decision making, fending for the family as a bread winner, transportation of animals from one place to another, disciplining the children, fencing, digging wells and boreholes and ensuring the woman does not struggle to work in order to feed a family. Additional findings show that the community in Dadaab believes that gender equality is demeaning to men by affecting their roles in the family. The inequality has also deprived women of opportunity for employment hence, reduces the household income in the long run. The study found out that the cultural belief in the Somali community in Dadaab adopts a patriarchal framework, where the man is expected to be the breadwinner and head of the household with an obligation of providing the family with steady and reliable income. The study recommends deconstruction of the patriarchal nature of the Somali community that downplays the role of women in society by way of policy to manage stereotyping of women and advocate for gender equality and social inclusion and participation of both for sustainable development.

Keywords: Community Development, Gender Stereotypes, Social Inclusion for Sustainable Development

References

  1. Bojer, H. (2005). The Social Contract, Unpaid Child Care and Women’s Economic Capability, Manuscript, University of Oslo.
     Google Scholar
  2. Burda, M., Hamermesh, D. & Weil, P. (2007). Total work, Gender and Social Norms. NBER Working, 13000
     Google Scholar
  3. Duflo, E. & Udry, C. (2003). Intra-household resource allocation in Côte D’Ivoire: Social norms, separate accounts and consumption choices. Economic Growth Center Discussion, 857.
     Google Scholar
  4. Eagly A. H. & Carli L. L. (2003). The Female Leadership Advantage. An evaluation of the evidence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 807–834.
     Google Scholar
  5. Eagly, A.H. (1987). Sex Differences in Social Behavior. A Social Role Interpretation, Hilsdale, MJ. Earlbaum.
     Google Scholar
  6. Esteve-Volart, B. (2000). Sex Discrimination and Growth. IMF Working Paper, 00/84.
     Google Scholar
  7. Ferber, A. & Nelson, J. (2003). Feminists Economies Today. Beyond Economic Man. 10 Years Later. Feminist Economies Today, University of Chicago Press.
     Google Scholar
  8. Grosz, E. (2010). The Practice of Feminist Theory, Differences. A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 21, 94-108.
     Google Scholar
  9. Heilman, M. E. (2001). Descriptive And Prescriptive: How Gender Stereotypes Prevent Women's Ascent Up The Organizational Ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4),657-674.
     Google Scholar
  10. Heilman, M. E., & Chen, J. J. (2005). Same Behavior, Different Consequences: Reactions to Men's and Women's Altruistic Citizenship Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(3),431-441.
     Google Scholar
  11. Heilman, M. E., & Haynes, M. C. (2005). No Credit Where Credit Is Due: Attributional Rationalization of Women's Success in Male-Female Teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 905-916.
     Google Scholar
  12. Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., & Fuchs, D. (2004). Penalties for Success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3),416-427.
     Google Scholar
  13. Holbrook, A. & Krosnick, J. Pfent A. (2007). The Causes and Consequences of Response Rates in Surveys by the News Media and Government Contractor Survey Research Firms. Advances in Telephone Survey Methodology. University of Illinois.
     Google Scholar
  14. Inglehart, R. & Norris, P. (2003b). Rising Tide. In Gender Equality and Cultural Change. Cambridge University Press
     Google Scholar
  15. James, A. (2012). Factors Influencing Vulnerability of Women in Refugee Camps: The Case of Dadaab Refugee Camp; Garissa County, Kenya [MA Project]. Gender and Development Studies, University of Nairobi.
     Google Scholar
  16. Kent, W. T., Blair, C. A. & Rudd, H. F. (2010). Gender Differences and Transformational Leadership Behavior: Do Both German Men and Women Lead in the Same Way? International Journal of Leadership Studies, 6(1), 13-25.
     Google Scholar
  17. Kimmel, M. (2008). Guyland. HarperCollins Publishers. New York, United States of America.
     Google Scholar
  18. Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research Methodology. In Methods and Techniques (2nd Edition). New Age International, New Delhi, India.
     Google Scholar
  19. Lyness, K. S., & Heilman, M. E. (2006). When Fit Is Fundamental: Performance Evaluations And Promotions Of Upper-Level Female And Male Managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 777-785.
     Google Scholar
  20. Miles, C. A. (2005). Patriarchy or Gender Equality? Reading the New Testament in Light of Becker’s Treatise on the Family and the Concept of Spiritual Capital. Paper presented at the Annuals Meetings of the Association for the Study of Religion, Economics, and Culture.
     Google Scholar
  21. Mugenda, O.M. & Mugenda A.G. (2003). Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches (2nd Edition.). ACTS Press, Nairobi, Kenya.
     Google Scholar
  22. Mwangovya, H. A. (2011). Social Problems Faced By Women Refugees in Dadaab Refugee Camp, North-Eastern Kenya [Unpublished Thesis]. University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
     Google Scholar
  23. Nyabuti, D. (2011). Refugees in Kenya Dadaab Refugees Camp, Garrisa County. M.A Project. University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
     Google Scholar
  24. Predelli, L. (2004) Interpreting Gender in Islam. A Case Study of Immigrant Muslim Women in Oslo, Norway. Gender & Society, 473, (1), 93-112.
     Google Scholar
  25. Rebecca, J. C. & Simone, C. (2010). Gender Stereotyping. In Transnational Legal Perspectives. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press. United States of America.
     Google Scholar
  26. Roald, A.S. (2001). Women in Islam. In The Western Experience. Routledge, London.
     Google Scholar
  27. Schneider, Friedrich (2003). The Shadow Economy. In Charles K. Rowley and Friedrich Schneider (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Public Choice. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
     Google Scholar
  28. Sharf, R.S. (2008). Feminist Therapy. A Multicultural Approach. In Theories of Psychotherapy and Counseling. Concepts and Cases (4th ed., pp. 435-477). Belmont, California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
     Google Scholar
  29. Stroh, L. K, Brett, J. M., & Reilly, A. H. (1992). All The Right Stuff: A Comparison of Female and Male Manager's Career Progression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(3), 251-260.
     Google Scholar
  30. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2002). Household Data. Monthly Household Data. Retrieved from ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/suppl/empsit 19.txt on 23rd May 2016.
     Google Scholar
  31. Upagade, V. & Shende, A. (2012). Research Methodology. S. Chand & Company Ltd. New Delhi, India.
     Google Scholar